<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Responsibility Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/</link>
	<description>Everyday Leadership Through Everyday Actions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 15:10:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Good Leaders: Tough and Tender &#124; Lead Change Group</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-2372</link>
		<dc:creator>Good Leaders: Tough and Tender &#124; Lead Change Group</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-2372</guid>
		<description>[...] the individual commits whole-heartedly to learning, performing and improving. They own and are responsible for their performance; the leader owns holding them consistently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the individual commits whole-heartedly to learning, performing and improving. They own and are responsible for their performance; the leader owns holding them consistently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Come Back Common Sense…We Need You! &#171; You&#8217;re Not the Boss of Me</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Come Back Common Sense…We Need You! &#171; You&#8217;re Not the Boss of Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-884</guid>
		<description>[...] The Responsibility Myth by Susan Mazza  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Responsibility Myth by Susan Mazza  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Mazza</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Mazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Thank you Mark for adding richness and clarity in your comments.

You make a few points I want to emphasize:  &quot;lack of role awareness is one of a handful of root causes of team dysfunction.&quot; - Absolutely, this is only one cause, not THE cause. 

The problem arises once those roles are “defined” – and how they are defined – and especially when people do not support the team with their discretionary behavior... Focus your attentions on self-motivated discretionary behaviors that support team mission.&quot;  I think essentially this points to the difference between being accountable for your &quot;defined tasks&quot; vs. being accountable to the team&#039;s shared commitment and doing whatever it takes, defined or not.

I believe a team&#039;s success requires that we define BOTH clear roles AND promises to the team/other team members.  I think it is our promises that ultimately drive the discretionary behavior you distinguished here.  Defining roles is very useful and many times essential, but they are not enough to ensure collaboration or success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mark for adding richness and clarity in your comments.</p>
<p>You make a few points I want to emphasize:  &#8220;lack of role awareness is one of a handful of root causes of team dysfunction.&#8221; &#8211; Absolutely, this is only one cause, not THE cause. </p>
<p>The problem arises once those roles are “defined” – and how they are defined – and especially when people do not support the team with their discretionary behavior&#8230; Focus your attentions on self-motivated discretionary behaviors that support team mission.&#8221;  I think essentially this points to the difference between being accountable for your &#8220;defined tasks&#8221; vs. being accountable to the team&#8217;s shared commitment and doing whatever it takes, defined or not.</p>
<p>I believe a team&#8217;s success requires that we define BOTH clear roles AND promises to the team/other team members.  I think it is our promises that ultimately drive the discretionary behavior you distinguished here.  Defining roles is very useful and many times essential, but they are not enough to ensure collaboration or success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sturgell, CBC</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sturgell, CBC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-827</guid>
		<description>By no means do I disagree with anything that has been written here, in Susan&#039;s article or the many comments.  In fact, i agree wholeheartedly.  However, we may be missing a critical nuance in the thesis that &quot;role definitions&quot; are the problem, rather than focusing on how &quot;role definitions&quot; are used and people&#039;s general response to them.

Roles, and mutual expectations of one another&#039;s roles, are important to team success. Some of these roles may be pre-determined and &quot;defined&quot;; some may be more situational.  In any case, we all have primary, secondary, tertiary... roles on a team. All team members must share a common role, which is critical and often missing, which leads to the problems described in this article and thread of discussion: that is, team members must have a primary focus to support and pursue the mission and purpose of the team.

Roles can provide necessary focus and a healthy way of organizing effort just as they can get in the way, lead to &quot;siloing&quot;, etc.  One key to success is recognizing that regardless of your defined role, your default responsibility is to pursue and the support the team&#039;s mission in collaboration with other team members. One might say this is Job No. 1.

My experience in over 20 years of coaching and working with teams is that lack of role awareness is one of a handful of root causes of team disfunction.  The problem arises once those roles are &quot;defined&quot; - and how they are defined - and especially when people do not support the team with their discretionary behavior.  

Focus your attentions on self-motivated discretionary behaviors that support team mission and you will see significant increases in collective performance and satisfaction.  Susan offers excellent suggestions and do a few commenters.  Right vs. Wrong and Win-Lose conflicts will turn into innovative, collaborative, idea-generating conflict and We-All-Win competition.

Read &quot;The Measure of a Leader&quot;, by Daniels and Daniels.  Excellent book which provides research and perspective on this and similar issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By no means do I disagree with anything that has been written here, in Susan&#8217;s article or the many comments.  In fact, i agree wholeheartedly.  However, we may be missing a critical nuance in the thesis that &#8220;role definitions&#8221; are the problem, rather than focusing on how &#8220;role definitions&#8221; are used and people&#8217;s general response to them.</p>
<p>Roles, and mutual expectations of one another&#8217;s roles, are important to team success. Some of these roles may be pre-determined and &#8220;defined&#8221;; some may be more situational.  In any case, we all have primary, secondary, tertiary&#8230; roles on a team. All team members must share a common role, which is critical and often missing, which leads to the problems described in this article and thread of discussion: that is, team members must have a primary focus to support and pursue the mission and purpose of the team.</p>
<p>Roles can provide necessary focus and a healthy way of organizing effort just as they can get in the way, lead to &#8220;siloing&#8221;, etc.  One key to success is recognizing that regardless of your defined role, your default responsibility is to pursue and the support the team&#8217;s mission in collaboration with other team members. One might say this is Job No. 1.</p>
<p>My experience in over 20 years of coaching and working with teams is that lack of role awareness is one of a handful of root causes of team disfunction.  The problem arises once those roles are &#8220;defined&#8221; &#8211; and how they are defined &#8211; and especially when people do not support the team with their discretionary behavior.  </p>
<p>Focus your attentions on self-motivated discretionary behaviors that support team mission and you will see significant increases in collective performance and satisfaction.  Susan offers excellent suggestions and do a few commenters.  Right vs. Wrong and Win-Lose conflicts will turn into innovative, collaborative, idea-generating conflict and We-All-Win competition.</p>
<p>Read &#8220;The Measure of a Leader&#8221;, by Daniels and Daniels.  Excellent book which provides research and perspective on this and similar issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whose Job is It Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Whose Job is It Anyway?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-807</guid>
		<description>[...] the spirit of last week&#8217;s post The Responsibility Myth I am sharing a short post originally released in March [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the spirit of last week&#8217;s post The Responsibility Myth I am sharing a short post originally released in March [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Mazza</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Mazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Glad to have sparked your thinking Mary Ann.  Appreciate you stopping by and letting me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to have sparked your thinking Mary Ann.  Appreciate you stopping by and letting me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Mazza</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Mazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-804</guid>
		<description>Your comment is packed with powerful points Thomas.  Thank you for adding such richness to the discussion.

It is definitely not an either/or here.  To your point, clarity about our boundaries, in this case in the form of roles and responsibilities, is important to healthy relationships.  

Perhaps one of the best indications that an organization has likely defined roles and responsibilities in a way that is not healthy for the organization is the extent to which there is an &quot;us vs them&quot; dynamic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment is packed with powerful points Thomas.  Thank you for adding such richness to the discussion.</p>
<p>It is definitely not an either/or here.  To your point, clarity about our boundaries, in this case in the form of roles and responsibilities, is important to healthy relationships.  </p>
<p>Perhaps one of the best indications that an organization has likely defined roles and responsibilities in a way that is not healthy for the organization is the extent to which there is an &#8220;us vs them&#8221; dynamic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Mazza</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Mazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 23:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Great point Rick - by focusing so much on the boundaries we impede both engagement and innovation, as well as collaboration.

I am looking forward to working with you in The Art of Accountability Webinar starting next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Rick &#8211; by focusing so much on the boundaries we impede both engagement and innovation, as well as collaboration.</p>
<p>I am looking forward to working with you in The Art of Accountability Webinar starting next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Waterhouse</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Waterhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 21:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I think that we must be impeccably clear about our boundaries. We must also be clear that healthy boundaries have permeability, allowing an exchange of our “goods” without acceptance of the “bads”, such as blame for the failing of a corporate endeavor. Boundaries should define roles and responsibilities, yet if they are mature, then they allow for flexibility, intimacy, expression, and acceptance (in fact, an embracing) that “nobody is smarter than all of us”. Healthy boundaries allow for “mutual interdependence”, and that point where all of our individual circles overlap becomes a powerful vortex of synergy and productivity! Thank you Susan... Respect!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we must be impeccably clear about our boundaries. We must also be clear that healthy boundaries have permeability, allowing an exchange of our “goods” without acceptance of the “bads”, such as blame for the failing of a corporate endeavor. Boundaries should define roles and responsibilities, yet if they are mature, then they allow for flexibility, intimacy, expression, and acceptance (in fact, an embracing) that “nobody is smarter than all of us”. Healthy boundaries allow for “mutual interdependence”, and that point where all of our individual circles overlap becomes a powerful vortex of synergy and productivity! Thank you Susan&#8230; Respect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ross</title>
		<link>http://randomactsofleadership.com/2010/05/25/the-responsibility-myt/comment-page-1/#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 19:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomactsofleadership.com/?p=1978#comment-796</guid>
		<description>You noted “roles and responsibilities are a kind of boundary”. Of course, boundaries are by definition limiting. Companies want employees to be both engaged and innovative, yet limitations serve neither end.  Despite this, adherence to the practices that produce them remain common. 

I appreciate this post for its willingness to challenge the status quo.  It makes an excellent point of which all leaders should take note. 

Thanks Susan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You noted “roles and responsibilities are a kind of boundary”. Of course, boundaries are by definition limiting. Companies want employees to be both engaged and innovative, yet limitations serve neither end.  Despite this, adherence to the practices that produce them remain common. </p>
<p>I appreciate this post for its willingness to challenge the status quo.  It makes an excellent point of which all leaders should take note. </p>
<p>Thanks Susan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

